Obama is trying to force the United States into a "green" technology that they can't afford and don't want. Wind power is 17 cents compared to 5 cents for coal. The artificial price increase is essentially an Obama Tax. At the present time, this tax on Americans from Obama's de facto moratorium is about a dollar a gallon.
Even more frustrating for many is the scant attention that the media has given the story. Less than 1% of all news coverage connects the price increases to Obama's moratorium. It seems the media is more interested in connecting rising gas prices to oil speculators, greedy oil companies, and unrest in Egypt. The reality is none of these issues would be substantially relevant to the price of gas at the pump if the US developed its own fossil fuels. Alaska alone has enough oil for 100 years.
The Obama administration has consistently blocked production and drilling in the United States at every turn. Only 6 permits have been approved, and past projects that were in progress when Obama took office have been suspended. The Obama administration will not allow Americans to develop their own resources and wants to perpetuate the dependence on foreign oil.
The windmill on the capital to generate energy from the hot air in Congress was a nice touch!
Thank you Congressman Don Young for your work on HR 1231! I wonder how Senator Murkowski will vote when it reaches the Senate?
Friday, May 13, 2011
Obama Administrations Agenda is No Work for the Working Man
Of course this blogger has always been a fan of Don Young, of Alaska. But he has been quiet of late. In fact, he has been so quiet there have been no small shortage of discussions about his age and his health.
This week, he came back with a roar! And what a roar it was! Here he confronts the EPA on their true Agenda: to kill capitalism. In fact, when it came time for Mrs. Stoner, EPA representative to respond, she was gone. She fled the hearing. Mrs. Stoner knew she couldn't respond, because she knew he was right!
Alaskans know that the EPA's agenda has been to shut down all economic activity in the state. They are constantly looking at ways to shut down energy production, mining, and any other activity that would help Alaskans be independent. We are on to them.
Thank you Don Young!
This week, he came back with a roar! And what a roar it was! Here he confronts the EPA on their true Agenda: to kill capitalism. In fact, when it came time for Mrs. Stoner, EPA representative to respond, she was gone. She fled the hearing. Mrs. Stoner knew she couldn't respond, because she knew he was right!
Alaskans know that the EPA's agenda has been to shut down all economic activity in the state. They are constantly looking at ways to shut down energy production, mining, and any other activity that would help Alaskans be independent. We are on to them.
Thank you Don Young!
Misogynistic Mathews: 1969 in a 2011 World
Newsbusted recently exposed the tactics used by Chris Mathews in discussing Newt Gingrich. in which a transcript of the discussion, as well as the video clip is displayed.
It is pretty clear that Mr. Mathews lives in 1969 and not 2011. He lives in a world where it is acceptable to engage in misogynistic tactics in interrogating subjects, rather than interviews. He lives in a world where Michigan is primarily black and Texas is primarily white. He lives in 1969.
Mr. Mathews fighting in the wrong field, and I don’t know why anyone would let him take them there. Even the blacks are fleeing Detroit in droves. They are heading to places all over the US where there is still freedom, and the data shows this. Why is Michigan being characterized as “black?” THAT is ignorant and racist. And who is the person who is the new “spokesman” for Detroit? Eminem? Isn’t he a white guy who cleans out closets and dubs his videos in Arabic?
The problem is that once again, MSBC engages in misogyny by brow beating a woman. The likes of Larry O’Donnell and Chris Mathews flourish in browbeating women of all color. I don’t know the woman in this clip, or why she was on this show, but she clearly has never had to push back in Illinois politics. Here is how the “push back” should have gone.
Is not the mere suggestion that the comparison of Michigan versus Texas implied racism on Chris Mathew’s part? Yes, Chris Mathews is a racist. As a Hispanic, I was very offended by Mathews remarks. Mathews clearly was attempting to slam the millions of Hispanics in Texas by implying they were inferior to the Arabs who have taken over in Michigan. I was furious that Chris Mathews would use antiquated stereotypes of these two regions to imply Newt Gingrich is a racist, attempt to frame the When was the last time Chris Mathews was in Texas? Or Michigan? How antiquated of MATHEWS to suggest that this is about “Black v White.” Does he think this is 1969 or 2011?
The battle ground coming before our nation is not black versus white. Both populations are in decline and are no longer the dominant cultural force. The dominant cultural force in Michigan is Arabic, not black or white. The dominant cultural force in Texas is Hispanic, not black or white. Has Chris Mathews left his studio since 1969? Black versus White? That is like talking about the battle of Vicksberg in discussing our battle strategy in Afghanistan. It is a fundamentally outdated way of examining the conflicts on the streets of America today. The battle today in the US is more like the battle that Queen Isabella fought in her nation. Both blacks and whites are fighting against the entrenchment of Sharia law in our nation.
Are the rural black Christian communities in Texas, the Hispanics in Texas somehow less valuable that the Arab communities in Detroit? Who is the racist? Who is the misogynist? It isn’t Newt Gingrich.
It is pretty clear that Mr. Mathews lives in 1969 and not 2011. He lives in a world where it is acceptable to engage in misogynistic tactics in interrogating subjects, rather than interviews. He lives in a world where Michigan is primarily black and Texas is primarily white. He lives in 1969.
Mr. Mathews fighting in the wrong field, and I don’t know why anyone would let him take them there. Even the blacks are fleeing Detroit in droves. They are heading to places all over the US where there is still freedom, and the data shows this. Why is Michigan being characterized as “black?” THAT is ignorant and racist. And who is the person who is the new “spokesman” for Detroit? Eminem? Isn’t he a white guy who cleans out closets and dubs his videos in Arabic?
The problem is that once again, MSBC engages in misogyny by brow beating a woman. The likes of Larry O’Donnell and Chris Mathews flourish in browbeating women of all color. I don’t know the woman in this clip, or why she was on this show, but she clearly has never had to push back in Illinois politics. Here is how the “push back” should have gone.
When Mathews started going on and on about Obama being raised by his white mother raising him, she should have come back with “So why did Obama write “Dreams of my Father” rather than “Dreams of my Mother?” Why did Obama write about the “coil of rage” he harbors against his mother and all white people because of her? Who is the racist? Obama who harbors a coil of rage, not Newt Gingrich! I don’t see any books by Newt Gingrich talking about his rage against white people, black people, or any other people. I do see Newt Gingrich standing up for Free Market Principles. This is consistent with Mr. Alford of the Black Chamber of Commerce, Alan Keyes, US Ambassador, and Herman Cain, formerly of the Federal Reserve. How is that racist?
Disagreeing with Mr. Obama on how to answer the three fundamental questions of economic organization does not make one a racist. Why is it that people cannot disagree with Mr. Obama’s white half? Why must all disagreements be with Mr. Obama’s black half? Why is Mr. Obama a racist?
Is not the mere suggestion that the comparison of Michigan versus Texas implied racism on Chris Mathew’s part? Yes, Chris Mathews is a racist. As a Hispanic, I was very offended by Mathews remarks. Mathews clearly was attempting to slam the millions of Hispanics in Texas by implying they were inferior to the Arabs who have taken over in Michigan. I was furious that Chris Mathews would use antiquated stereotypes of these two regions to imply Newt Gingrich is a racist, attempt to frame the When was the last time Chris Mathews was in Texas? Or Michigan? How antiquated of MATHEWS to suggest that this is about “Black v White.” Does he think this is 1969 or 2011?
The battle ground coming before our nation is not black versus white. Both populations are in decline and are no longer the dominant cultural force. The dominant cultural force in Michigan is Arabic, not black or white. The dominant cultural force in Texas is Hispanic, not black or white. Has Chris Mathews left his studio since 1969? Black versus White? That is like talking about the battle of Vicksberg in discussing our battle strategy in Afghanistan. It is a fundamentally outdated way of examining the conflicts on the streets of America today. The battle today in the US is more like the battle that Queen Isabella fought in her nation. Both blacks and whites are fighting against the entrenchment of Sharia law in our nation.
Are the rural black Christian communities in Texas, the Hispanics in Texas somehow less valuable that the Arab communities in Detroit? Who is the racist? Who is the misogynist? It isn’t Newt Gingrich.
Saturday, May 7, 2011
NBC: State Sanctioned Misogynist Lawrence O'Donnell
In recent months, many Americans, such as myself, have become increasingly frustrated with national media coverage. Part of this frustration comes from media topics that are not even being addressed in the stories, or information that isn't even covered, giving rise to citizen journalist outlets. The other aspect of this media bias is the treatment of media personalities of the people who are being interviewed in the main stream media (MSM). While Sarah Palin was poorly treated by the media, that was mild compared to today's media..
The most recent outrage in behavior has been MSNBC's Lawrence O'Donnell. He seems to take particularly sick delight in the role of Spanish Inquisitor against a variety of "guest victims." His show, Final Re-Write, seems to be inspired by the treatment of the Catholic Church toward Galileo rather than by journalism as it was taught in years gone by. In his interview of Orley Taitz, he interrogated her in a particularly demeaning fashion as he attempt to extract a confession and then threw her off the show when he was unable to intimidate her. In another interview, he pursued the same misogynist tactics against Condolizza Rice. Time and time again, Lawrence O'Donnell completely disrespected her experience, rank, and position and attempted to extract a confession from her that the War in Iraq was a failure. Because Mrs. Rice is an experienced negotiator, she was able to gracefully put Mr. O'Donnell in his place.
Ten years ago, these sort of interrogation tactics against women would have been viewed with great public disdain and outcry. The National Organization of Women would have been marching in the streets, leading boycotts against these media outlets and their sponsors. Yet now, there is silence. In my utter disgust, I wanted to write to the owner of NBC to complain. But who would I be complaining to? I wasn't exactly certain, so I set out to find the facts on who owns NBC, and why their rude treatment is allowed to persist as some kind of facade of journalism. I wanted to try to find out, who is in charge of the show? Who would I protest? Who do I write to? Who is the money behind this bizarre behavior?
As Brian Williams often mentions on the NBC Nightly News, General Electric is the parent company of NBC. Well, that seemed straight forward enough, because General Electric's CEO Jeffrey Immelt was also on President Obama's Economic Recovery Advisory Board. But then I remembered that Jeffrey Immelt was under some kind of Securities and Exchange Commission investigation, and was fined a substantial sum of money. So, I didn't really know if Immelt was still the CEO of GE. Even so, certainly as CEO, Jeffry Immelt had to answer to someone?
Upon closer inspection, I knew I had to find out exactly who Immelt reported to at GE. After all, CEO's are hired and fired too, and there is often a major holder on the board of directors. Sometimes, it is easier to raise issues of sexist and race through major players on the board of directors, or major shareholders, or major debt holders. Amazingly, I found out that General Electric, with its AAA Moody's rating relies substantially on Commercial Paper to run its daily operations. What I found, starting with October of 2008, that the entity that held most of GE's Commerical Paper was the Federal Reserve. Indeed, as recent documents reveal, GE was the main non-bank recipient of Federal Reserve Bail Out Money.
The most recent outrage in behavior has been MSNBC's Lawrence O'Donnell. He seems to take particularly sick delight in the role of Spanish Inquisitor against a variety of "guest victims." His show, Final Re-Write, seems to be inspired by the treatment of the Catholic Church toward Galileo rather than by journalism as it was taught in years gone by. In his interview of Orley Taitz, he interrogated her in a particularly demeaning fashion as he attempt to extract a confession and then threw her off the show when he was unable to intimidate her. In another interview, he pursued the same misogynist tactics against Condolizza Rice. Time and time again, Lawrence O'Donnell completely disrespected her experience, rank, and position and attempted to extract a confession from her that the War in Iraq was a failure. Because Mrs. Rice is an experienced negotiator, she was able to gracefully put Mr. O'Donnell in his place.
Ten years ago, these sort of interrogation tactics against women would have been viewed with great public disdain and outcry. The National Organization of Women would have been marching in the streets, leading boycotts against these media outlets and their sponsors. Yet now, there is silence. In my utter disgust, I wanted to write to the owner of NBC to complain. But who would I be complaining to? I wasn't exactly certain, so I set out to find the facts on who owns NBC, and why their rude treatment is allowed to persist as some kind of facade of journalism. I wanted to try to find out, who is in charge of the show? Who would I protest? Who do I write to? Who is the money behind this bizarre behavior?
As Brian Williams often mentions on the NBC Nightly News, General Electric is the parent company of NBC. Well, that seemed straight forward enough, because General Electric's CEO Jeffrey Immelt was also on President Obama's Economic Recovery Advisory Board. But then I remembered that Jeffrey Immelt was under some kind of Securities and Exchange Commission investigation, and was fined a substantial sum of money. So, I didn't really know if Immelt was still the CEO of GE. Even so, certainly as CEO, Jeffry Immelt had to answer to someone?
Upon closer inspection, I knew I had to find out exactly who Immelt reported to at GE. After all, CEO's are hired and fired too, and there is often a major holder on the board of directors. Sometimes, it is easier to raise issues of sexist and race through major players on the board of directors, or major shareholders, or major debt holders. Amazingly, I found out that General Electric, with its AAA Moody's rating relies substantially on Commercial Paper to run its daily operations. What I found, starting with October of 2008, that the entity that held most of GE's Commerical Paper was the Federal Reserve. Indeed, as recent documents reveal, GE was the main non-bank recipient of Federal Reserve Bail Out Money.
So, now I am beginning to see the picture. The Federal Reserve owns GE. Jeffry Immelt is the CEO for GE and also works for President Obama. In turn, GE owns NBC and its various cable and internet outlets. So, Jeff Immelt works for both the Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernake through GE and for President Barack Obama through the Economic Recovery and Advisory Board? Since Jeff Immelt also owns NBC through GE, then who is controlling the news? So, I now wonder, is misogyny the policy of the Obama Administration? GE? The Federal Reserve? Is this activity something that is state sanctioned? President Obama, would you like your daughters and your wife treated like that?
Who is controlling the news content? Who is allowing this misogynist treatment to persist on the part of Lawrence O'Donnell? Now I understand what author Craig Smith means when he calls America's media turning into CHINA-STYLE “CRONY CAPITALISM." For Tienaman Square, turn on Lawrence O'Donnell. For news you can trust, you'll have to go somewhere else.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)